Average rating:
Saeed Dd
131
Saeed Dd 2023.03.31 11:52 
 

Finally a reliable signal on mql5.

JPIRTrades
2556
JPIRTrades 2023.03.26 21:05 
 

I have tested lots of signals and believe this to be the best allrounder signal there is on MQL5, if you don't want to have any hassle and are looking for a very balanced truly set and forget signal. The only downside is that you should have a balance as close as possible to the signal balance, I believe copying this with 3k accounts would be a mistake.

jeffcwdai
472
jeffcwdai 2023.03.14 08:44  (modified 2023.08.23 10:10) 
 

Constant self-evaluation, impressive diversification, while at the same time generating profit with comparatively low risk

2023.08.23 update: I maintain my positive opinion towards the signal. I further add that you need a balance close to or more than the signal's to achieve similar results and drawdown percentages.

Thorax
1021
Thorax 2023.03.14 08:10  (modified 2023.07.25 12:52) 
 

Ich abonniere das Signal bereits seit 3 Montanen. Die Performance ist so wie ich diese anhand der Beschreibung und anderen kommentaren erwartet habe gut und stabil. Es handel sich um ein Signal mit sehr vielen EA's, die verschiedenen Strategien handeln. In der Telegramm-Gruppe gibt es regelmäßig einen Report über die Performance der EA's und des Portfolios. Das Signal ist nicht zuletzt wegen der moderaten monatlichen Gewinnen (gehört zu der gewünschten Strategie) für langfristigorientierte Anelger geeignet. Durch die große Deversifikation wird der Risk eines totalen Ausfalls stark minimiert. Ich bleibe mit einem Teil meines Geldes dabei.

update 25.07.2023 Nach wie vor sehr gutes signal mit moderaten, kontinuierlichen Gewinnen und niedrigem DD

Jesper Schmidt
1165
Jesper Schmidt 2022.09.09 19:01  (modified 2022.10.22 11:52) 
 

Update 22 October 2022: Can only re-iterate what I already wrote below. Have been subscribed now over 4 months and the way this signal handles risk/reward is outstanding.

I am in no way connected to the signal owner but can highly recommend this signal for investor-type subscribers. This signal will be not be volatile enough for gambler-type subscribers.

One more thing - the apparent 'low signal stability' is not something I can relate to. On my account all signals are copied 100% accurately with little or no slippage. Just checked today to see that also the backlog of open trades matches 100%.

09 September 2022: I have been subscribing to this signal for around 12 weeks now, enough time for a real review. After having spent a lot of time trawling through signals on MQL5 - and before that EAs - I have discarded many due to their inherent risk, so I was happy when I came across Sumo. I have been VERY pleased with the overall risk in this signal, due to the low risk per trade and high volume of trades, I dare say this is one of the least risky signals I have seen here.

As for the reward side, I have been subscribing in a period that has been described as a hard period for the signal. I am very pleased to see that the signal has been profitable and very safe during what is perceived to be a difficult time. My own experience is however, that my reception of the signal has been substantially more profitable than the original signal itself. This is because I have had it linked to only a EUR 5,000 account so all trades not being 0.01 lot size have been reduced in size. Consequently, I have seen smaller lots and higher profit %. In my 12 weeks I have made 23%, which is more than anticipated and this at what I perceive to be very low risk.

The future: I am seriously considering abandoning my other subscriptions and focusing only on this signal. The other signals have also been profitable, but the risk has been higher. Some are basically just waiting for a disaster to happen. Sumo on the other hand has long term potential because of how risk is handled. The diversification inherent in the large amount of trades and small amount of risk per trade is the true long term perspective. I can easily live with months around 0% as long as I can see the long term profitability of >30% pa. and as long as the risk is kept low.

I should mention that the coaching/info provided by signalowner is very good. My main concern is that this signal one day shuts down so I will need to again rely on other, potentially much more risky signals.

This signal gets my highest recommendation among those 8 signals I have so far subscribed to.

GFMC Unlimited
4625
Matthew Simon Gream 2022.07.21 16:04  (modified 2023.12.11 12:48) 
 

11/12/2023 -

Checking out of this signal after 519 days of subscription. Today is last day.

I always had a love hate relationship. I loved it for the results, because they were good and steady, but I hated it because of the high volume of trades and the level of stop loss. I keep detailed statistics and in one month, across the portfolio of my 25 signals/advisers (at the time), this one contributed 3.5% to my profits (just less than average), but it ran 19.67% of trades (5x more than average). Sometimes it was volatile: at one stage, the monthly gain went from 3.x% to 1.x% and then 12 hours later, to 7.x%. So if you subscribe, be aware that you may need a moth or so for initial profitability. Be aware you also need a decent level of capital and margin.

Two things to be aware of (1) as a portfolio of algorithms, you will see contrary positions at the time; (2) by introducing stop loss, it will protect, but it can also kick in just before a reversal (considering that the authors have probably pegged stop loss onto existing algorithms that were going to recover). Pros and cons, but is true that the ultimate measure is the results:

After 215 days, I had 52.65% gain. After 519 days, I have 89.55% gain. Gain was higher before the last couple of months of course, peaking at 109.86%. The daily gain on this signal is still in the upper ranks of my portfolio (42 signals/advisers, and this one ranks 12th).

I'm checking out because I think the strategy is gone for now at least. Due to recent issues, signal has now moved to a smaller amount of activity / positions, and probably a smaller amount of diversification, which is not the original strategy, and now I'm concerned the authors are trying to find ways (by selecting specific algorithms, or manually tuning trades) to recover from recent losses. I think we're in for choppy weather for now. Might resubscribe when I see return to original.

Bin Xie
727
Bin Xie 2022.07.21 15:18  (modified 2022.08.03 03:34) 
 

突破开单真的非常垃圾,一直在止损,而且单开的非常大,订阅了20天,亏损了4%

2022.8.2,跟了这个策略马上一个月时间,目前亏损6%,惨无人道,太坑了!

Zane
429
Zane 2022.07.05 16:44  (modified 2023.07.14 13:52) 
 

I have been subscribing to this signal for more than a year.

I started subscribing to the signal with 1k eur to test how it will work and gradually increase the amount monthly.

Overall, I can say just good words about my expierance. So far I earned more than 200%.

This signal is still better then i expected. The signal is not suitable for those who want to get rich fast but rather for those who want to have some stable profit with reasonable risk. As the signal is well diversified, the big onesided movements are handled well. I see this signal as a good instrument for diversification, especially, if there are investments in other asset classes.

The author openly communicates with subscribers about what is happening in the signal and he regularly update about the performance of the signal.

I'll continue to subscribing to this siganl to reach even new highs.

profesors
731
profesors 2022.06.12 16:51 
 

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

ElinaZ
36
ElinaZ 2021.04.28 19:23 
 

The author is very friendly & professional. I didn't manage to set the signal right as trading conditions with my broker differ from those of this signal. Trades were copied correctly but with different amount, as my broker didn't allow me to have the same leverage as this signal providers. Sandis, thank you for helping to understand it on time to receive re-fund of subscription fee.

12