Había una vez un trader muy juicioso que colocaba trades de 1 microlote, eventualmente los ponía de 2. Yo cariñosamente lo llamaba ANTARITOS, diminutivo de Antares, en español. Todo iba perfecto y todos felices hasta que el Genio ENLOQUECIÒ, y de un aceptable MaxDD de 30.5% lo pasó en un abrir y cerrar de ojos a 97.4% no sé cómo está aún vivo. No se explica uno cómo de 1 microlote pasò a colocar 5!!! Y hasta 10 microlotes en una cuenta CHIQUITA de USD1.000 de fondeo… Qué loco!!! Sin importarle los fondos de sus suscriptores. Dicen las malas lenguas que fue que el señor le vendió la cuenta a otro, dizque ese es otro negocio que también existe, yo no lo sé… O decidió llenarse los bolsillos en un chasquido de dedos… Me suena más por ahí…

Antaritos, querido Antaritos, VUELVE A TU TRADING HABITUAL que nos vas a tirar la cuenta a la caneca de la basura!!! ¡Sé responsable por DIOS!!!

*ESTO TE LO HABIA ESCRITO POR INBOX EL 12 DE MARZO 2023, MAS LOCO YO QUE TE SEGUÌ COPIANDO HASTA QUE TIRASTE LA CUENTA A LA BASURA!!! LOL.

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

As a long-term subscriber, his trade style much changed last few months. I still earn a bit, but not worth it after following him for more than a year. It seems that after making some loss on the account. He is eager for profit and to open more positions; hopefully, it will make a profit to show in port by the end of each month. This account was good in the past, but I don't know about the future. The account didn't have any SL anymore.

Unreliable provider, mainly beacause he does not provide any consistency in risk management. With a balance of 800 usd he has always traded using lots of 0.01 or 0.02. Suddenly, after a streak of losses, that can always happen and that would have been acceptable as part of the game, he nearly tripled the sizes to 0.05 in an attempt to recover, on top of this opening 4 identical trade for a total of 0.20 so in total 10 times higher risk.. Showing poor capacity of control and no respect to his subscribers. Also this miserable attempt failed as the 10 times bigger trades went as well in wrong direction, depleting accounts. Avoid following this trader: the most important thing to prevent capital loss is that there is consistency, and that you can expect what you have seen untill that moment to repeat. You can base decision to follow a trader only on the past behaviour, and you expect this to continue, or you would not have chosen him.

Terrible trade with a series of losses.

The signal was very good until last November. But now this provider is trying to blow our account. Fortunately I could stop synchronization before FOMC and Current Employment Statistics with small loss. Otherwise, I would lost half of the deposit. And after checking EMS today, I understood he dare to try damaging our account. I don't know he is using EA or not, but at least his current trading strategy is not same as 2 month ago. His current strategy is grid with martingale strategy with poor environmental analysis then all positions are closed by stoploss. I stopped renewal of this signal.

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

what the hell are you doing !! are you the same person with this history ?

After two months, I leave the signal, since I have not liked the following things, in case it helps those of you who are undecided:

The trading strategy shown by the signal in the past does not have much to do with the current one.

During the two months, we have had the opportunity to close trades with quite a few profits, but it does not close them and when it does it is late and with losses.

The feeling I have is that behind it uses an EA with a martingale, and what it does is assign some preventive stoploss in order to make it appear that it is operating manually.

The entries in the trades are often at the wrong time.

If you ask him something, he takes a month or two months to answer.

And finally, what I liked the least, in addition to the 0 management of operations, is that I discovered in a forum that this user had already exploited several signals in the past, with screenshots of his signals as evidence.

To those of you who stay, good luck and compared to other martingale signals that are pure luck, this one is not bad, because it has stops.

Regards

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

seems stable with low risk but I only got $30ish profit for dec (breakeven for the subscription).

Marat is very nice and very supportive. However the performance over the past 3 Months or so (which is the time period I have been subscribing) has been a bit disappointing so I am unsubscribing. While I have not studied it all the time my impression is that not that infrequently his positions are in profit initially, but then turn negative so you end up with a loss when one could have made profit. On the other hand - obviously - this system still stands unlike quite a few other systems on MQL5 that have been wiped out!!

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

I'm now following Antares for 6 month and results are steady and predictable. No big risk with Martingale, but some additional ups and down which is more than normal for real trading. My earnings correspond 95% to the earnings reported in MQL5 and I never had problems to follow the signal (I use a VPS in NY).

My only wish: I hope Antares will withdraw some money soon or double the lot-size to 0.02 to make it easier to have an own account size different from the original one.

Trés aléatoire comme résultats.

User didn't leave any comment to the rating

User didn't leave any comment to the rating